Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Syrian Civil War

This article "Civil War in Syria Raises Questions About When to Intervene" by Ja'anai Delaney is about if the U.S. should get involved with Syrian Civil War. Some people think we shouldn't because we have are own problems to handle. Some say we should because it's wrong that Assad is killing all them people. The government say we will get involved if they start using chemical weapons.

In the article it says "While the U.S. and its allies support the anti-regime groups, they have said they will not intervene military unless Assad uses chemical weapons." This means the U.S. will not send troops over to Syria to fight unless Assad uses chemical weapons. In the article it also says "Temporary camps built to house large numbers of refugees are only a short-term solution," This means that the people who are leaving Syria because of the war are being put in a refugee camp for a short period of time.

I think we shouldn't get involved. I think so because the U.S. is already in a huge debt and it will cost a lot of money to put armed troops over to Syria and to get them back home.

Will armed troops still be sent to Syria? Will Assad use chemical weapons? Will the government decide to not send troops over to Syria?

1 comment:

  1. Good, but short. This post could use more of your own thoughts, reasons and commentary. 85

    ReplyDelete